Examples of charts, averages, correlations, p-values, and samples that can mislead without obvious falsehoods.
Bad data interpretation rarely announces itself. A chart can crop the axis, an average can hide the distribution, a correlation can come from a shared cause, and a p-value can be treated like proof even when it is only one clue.
This collection is practical data literacy: how to inspect a claim, ask for the denominator, check the sample, and look for the picture hidden behind the summary number. It is built for the moments when a chart or headline feels precise but you need to know whether the precision is earned.
Use the pages together. A misleading chart, a weak p-value interpretation, and a biased sample are different failure modes, but they often appear in the same article, report, dashboard, or pitch.
A quick checklist for any claim
Ask: compared with what, measured how, and selected from whom? Then ask whether the number is a count, a rate, an average, a model estimate, or a statistical test result. Most misleading statistics become easier to spot once the denominator, sample, and uncertainty are visible.
Charts and summaries need each other
Truncated axes show how a chart can exaggerate. Anscombe's quartet shows the opposite problem: a table can hide the shape that a chart reveals. The safest habit is to use both. Let the graph show structure, then let the summary quantify what the graph suggests.
Evidence is not the same as certainty
P-values, confidence intervals, publication bias, and small samples all point to the same rule: evidence has strength, direction, and uncertainty. A result can be interesting without being settled. A responsible reader asks how noisy the estimate is and what evidence would be missing if the claim were weaker than it looks.